Privileged material · Read in-house

Privileged documents, analysed without disclosure.

Attorney work product, privileged correspondence and expert drafts are exactly the material a firm cannot upload — and exactly where the analysis is most valuable.

Request a Briefing See what it does

The documents firms will not put in a cloud tool

These are the ones HIGHCOURT was built to read.

Attorney work product

Internal memoranda, strategy notes and draft analysis, read alongside the record they refer to.

Privileged correspondence

Client communications that cannot be disclosed to a vendor under any data-processing agreement.

Expert and consulting material

Non-testifying expert work whose protection depends on it staying inside the firm.

Settlement and negotiation files

Positions and authority that would be commercially damaging in anyone else's hands.

What stays true on every matter

These do not change by practice area, firm size, or the question asked.

Nothing leaves the firmNo cloud, no API call, no telemetry. The matter is read on hardware the firm owns.

Owned, not subscribedA one-time purchase. No per-seat monthly fee and no usage meter.

Citations verified on-machineAuthority is checked against a local corpus, not recalled from a model’s memory.

The entire matterFull workup across the whole file — not a chat window over one document.

Runs on your workstationA current RTX-class GPU. Designed to run with no internet connection at all.

Start with the file you would never upload.

That is the honest test. If the tool is only useful on material you were relaxed about, it is not solving the problem.

Request a Briefing

Questions firms ask

The answers below are specific to this page’s subject.

Does it separate privileged from non-privileged material?

Privilege flags are applied during document classification, and the review surfaces them. The determination remains an attorney's, as it has to be.

Can it help with a privilege log?

It can identify candidates and pull the metadata a log needs. The log itself is legal work and stays that way.

What if privileged material was produced by mistake?

A finding of that kind is exactly what the review queue is for — it is surfaced as an issue rather than silently used.

Is the analysis itself privileged?

Work product generated at an attorney's direction generally carries the same protections as other work product. Because it is created and stored inside the firm, the usual third-party complication does not arise.

Other pages covering the same ground from a different angle.

Secure on-premise AI for attorney-client privilege Confidential legal AI (ABA 1.6) AI redaction & conflicts check (offline) Secure legal document analysis AI Zero data leave / no cloud legal AI Air-gapped AI for law firm data security

See it run on a real matter.

A briefing walks the whole path — intake, workup, the Adjudicator's pass, and the work product that comes out the other side.