Small firms · Capacity without headcount

Capacity that does not require another hire.

Small firms compete on responsiveness and lose on volume. Reading the whole file is where the gap actually is.

Request a Briefing See what it does

What changes for a firm of two to fifteen

Not headcount. The amount of the record anyone can actually read.

Take the matter you would have referred out

Document-heavy matters get turned away because the reading does not fit. That constraint moves.

Costs that do not scale with people

Per-workstation, not per-seat. Growing the firm does not multiply the software bill.

Confidentiality without infrastructure

The same obligations as a large firm, met by not transmitting the file rather than by a security programme you cannot staff.

An answer for the client questionnaire

Institutional clients now ask where AI processing happens. "On our own hardware, and it never leaves" is a strong answer.

What stays true on every matter

These do not change by practice area, firm size, or the question asked.

Nothing leaves the firmNo cloud, no API call, no telemetry. The matter is read on hardware the firm owns.

Owned, not subscribedA one-time purchase. No per-seat monthly fee and no usage meter.

Citations verified on-machineAuthority is checked against a local corpus, not recalled from a model’s memory.

The entire matterFull workup across the whole file — not a chat window over one document.

Runs on your workstationA current RTX-class GPU. Designed to run with no internet connection at all.

Bring the matter you nearly turned down.

The document-heavy one you passed on because the review did not fit. That is the case this changes.

Request a Briefing

Questions firms ask

The answers below are specific to this page’s subject.

How many attorneys can share a workstation?

The licence is per machine. How a firm schedules access is its own decision; a busy practice may want a second machine.

Do we need a server room?

No. It is a workstation, kept offline, in the office.

How does this compare to a small-firm cloud subscription?

Capital up front against a recurring per-seat cost, plus the disclosure difference. The comparison page on ownership versus subscription sets both out.

What if we already use a cloud tool?

Many firms will run both — a cloud tool for general work and offline for privileged material. The matter-level decision is the one that matters.

Other pages covering the same ground from a different angle.

Offline legal AI for solo practitioners On-premise AI for mid-size law firms Owned (not subscribed) legal AI Offline legal AI for law firms One-time purchase legal AI (no monthly fees) Confidential legal AI (ABA 1.6)

See it run on a real matter.

A briefing walks the whole path — intake, workup, the Adjudicator's pass, and the work product that comes out the other side.