Query · Answers with sources
Ask the record a question. Get the page it came from.
A summary you cannot check is a summary you have to redo. Every answer here points at the passage that produced it.
What you can ask a whole matter
The questions that would otherwise mean a day of reading.
Cross-document questions
"Where did the parties address the cap?" — answered across the whole file, not the one document open in front of you.
Summaries with provenance
Every summarised point links to its source, so verification is a click rather than a search.
Contradiction surfacing
Where the record answers a question two different ways, you get both, with both passages.
Answers that admit gaps
If the file does not address it, that is the answer. Producing a plausible one instead is the failure mode that matters.
What stays true on every matter
These do not change by practice area, firm size, or the question asked.
Ask it something only the file can answer.
Pick a question you had to read three boxes to settle. That is the demonstration.
Request a BriefingQuestions firms ask
The answers below are specific to this page’s subject.
How is this different from a chat interface over documents?
The record is indexed as a whole and answers carry provenance. The difference shows on cross-document questions, where a chat window over one file cannot help.
Does it summarise depositions?
Yes, with page and line references, which is the only form of deposition summary worth having.
What if the answer is not in the file?
It says so. A confident answer to a question the record does not address is the most expensive kind of wrong.
Can it query across matters?
Yes, over the firm's own record, with sealed matters excluded from firm-wide queries.
Related
Other pages covering the same ground from a different angle.
See it run on a real matter.
A briefing walks the whole path — intake, workup, the Adjudicator's pass, and the work product that comes out the other side.
Request a Briefing