In-house · Inside the company

Company confidential material stays company confidential.

In-house teams hold commercial terms, board material and employee data. Sending it to a third-party AI service is a question the security team will ask about.

Request a Briefing See what it does

What an in-house team gets back

The volume work, done inside the perimeter your security team already defends.

Contract review at volume

Inbound third-party paper reviewed against the company's own positions, returned as a tracked-changes redline.

The obligations you signed

Renewal, notice and payment windows extracted from executed agreements — the ones nobody re-reads until they bite.

Outside counsel review

Read what you are sent before you pay for it, against the whole record you already hold.

Inside your existing perimeter

No new processor, no new DPA, no new questionnaire for your security team to answer.

What stays true on every matter

These do not change by practice area, firm size, or the question asked.

Nothing leaves the firmNo cloud, no API call, no telemetry. The matter is read on hardware the firm owns.

Owned, not subscribedA one-time purchase. No per-seat monthly fee and no usage meter.

Citations verified on-machineAuthority is checked against a local corpus, not recalled from a model’s memory.

The entire matterFull workup across the whole file — not a chat window over one document.

Runs on your workstationA current RTX-class GPU. Designed to run with no internet connection at all.

Bring your standard positions.

The fastest demonstration is watching third-party paper reviewed against the positions your team already holds.

Request a Briefing

Questions firms ask

The answers below are specific to this page’s subject.

Does this need approval from our security team?

It is a workstation inside your own environment with no external data flow, which is usually a considerably shorter review than onboarding a new processor.

Can it read our historical agreements?

Yes, and it can derive the company's actual positions from what has been executed rather than from what the policy says.

How does it fit alongside our CLM?

It reads from local storage and writes work product back. Where the CLM exposes a folder or export, that is the integration surface.

Is it useful for a small in-house team?

That is where it fits best. A two-lawyer team facing a company's entire contract flow has the sharpest volume problem.

Other pages covering the same ground from a different angle.

Contract & M&A due diligence AI (private) AI contract review & tracked-changes redline On-premise legal AI platform Enterprise / large firm offline legal AI Employment law AI research & review Intellectual property AI analysis

See it run on a real matter.

A briefing walks the whole path — intake, workup, the Adjudicator's pass, and the work product that comes out the other side.